I picked up a 50ct. box of a hundred and sixty Nosler Accubonds, but I am hesitant to burn the powder and projectiles on workup when all I have is 50 bullets. But I really need to find a bullet while in the one hundred sixty class that my older rifle likes.
H4831 will get the job done within the Swift although not true perfectly. You are going to under no circumstances have the pressures you'll need for regularity with the .223. 760, or H414 will likely be greater but for many rationale I ain't the greatest enthusiast of most ball powders.
This is one of the greatest causes reloaders are admonished to utilize new data only; and to start out low anytime you can get a new wide range of powder. You do not genuinely know (Until the corporation informs you so) that the new lots of powder was even manufactured at the identical factory as the powder you bought a few years back.
Sweet!! I will select some up and provides it a attempt. Thank you men, I respect it! I'll Permit you to really know what I uncover. I do have about a fifty percent pound of 4350 I'm able to test that to start with and find out what happens.
Anyway, I understood the two lbs of H4831SC utilised a similar data, but I didn't know irrespective of whether there was something various between a pound of powder labeled "Extreme" and a single not so labeled. A get in touch with to Hodgdon confirmed they had been in actual fact identical and the only difference was The brand to the label.
Any load data to assist that? My first imagined is it is not going to burn up many of the way and velocities will probably be sluggish and in every single place. May very well be a pleasant fireworks Exhibit!
i've employed both and employed the exact same rates h4831sc load data and also have not been able to convey to any noticable variations with performance. the SC Edition meters somewhat smoother is about all. any opinions??
Like said previously mentioned, similar stuff. All that differs is the scale with the kernels. I did listen to someplace that they are going to only make the SC Later on. I have no idea if that may be accurate or not but would make sense to me. I exploit SC for the reason that that is certainly what I present in the 8 lb jug and it really works.
At present employing IMR 4831 in a very 300WSM, and see the H4831sc is a popular choice for this caliber and yields somewhat more velocity. Besides it currently being limited Reduce, what exactly is the difference in both of these powders, and may I switch to H4831sc?
locutus mentioned: I nevertheless have an excellent stockpile of h4831 vs h4831sc H450, the ball powder equivalent of 4831, which flows via my powder measures effortlessly.
That is an more mature thread, you might not receive a response, and could be reviving an previous thread. You should think about making a new thread.
Back to previous internet site Shut When there is something h4831sc with your cart, it won't be introduced around towards the previous internet site.
Both equally hold the Identical melt away fee, quick cut is available in handy When you are at max fill and not at tension/velocity you want you will get extra shortcut in the case.
I sawed a single in 50 percent to check out how thick the jackets were, and so they have been quickly 2 times as thick for a 50-grain hollow place was. Ditto with the sixty four-grain Power Stage, as these bullets are developed for deer, not prairie canine or woodchucks. You now know all the things I know about the 22-250 and slow-burning powders, and I do not know anything whatsoever regarding the 223. I doubt that you are going to get anywhere with that cartridge and 4831, but let us know the way it goes.